Comparison
Buttondown vs Ghost
Buttondown and Ghost are both listed under Content & media in this directory. On the criteria this directory records they differ on focus, public source repo, last commit, stars. The table below compares them on identical criteria, drawn from what each product publishes.
By Fabian HugUpdated
Side by side
| Criterion | Buttondown | Ghost |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Tools | Tools |
| Type | Content & media | Content & media |
| Focus | newsletter, content | content, blogging, open-source |
| Public source repo | Not stated | Yes |
| Last commit | Not stated | Jul 2026 |
| Stars | Not stated | 54k |
| Documentation | Yes | Yes |
| llms.txt | Yes | Yes |
| Link verified | Jul 15, 2026 | Jul 15, 2026 |
| Listed since | Jul 12, 2026 | Jul 12, 2026 |
What each one is
Markdown-first newsletter tool with an API, popular for developer-audience newsletters.
Buttondown is listed under Content & media.
Questions
- What is the difference between Buttondown and Ghost?
- Buttondown is listed under Content & media. Ghost is listed under Content & media, tagged open-source. On the criteria this directory records they differ on focus, public source repo, last commit, stars; everything else it tracks is the same for both.
- Do Buttondown and Ghost publish their source code?
- Ghost publishes a public source repository; Buttondown does not list one in this directory. A public repository means the code is readable, not that it carries an open-source license.
How to read this
Every fact on this page is copied from the product's own site or repository and dated. We do not test these tools hands-on, we do not verify pricing, and the criteria are structural (what a product publishes) rather than qualitative (how well it works). Where a product does not state something, the table says so instead of guessing.
Keep comparing