Comparison
Plausible vs PostHog
Plausible and PostHog are both listed under Analytics & listening in this directory. On the criteria this directory records they differ on stars, mcp endpoint, llms.txt. The table below compares them on identical criteria, drawn from what each product publishes.
By Fabian HugUpdated
Side by side
| Criterion | Plausible | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Tools | Tools |
| Type | Analytics & listening | Analytics & listening |
| Focus | analytics, open-source | analytics, open-source |
| Public source repo | Yes | Yes |
| Last commit | Jul 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Stars | 28k | 37k |
| Documentation | Yes | Yes |
| MCP endpoint | Not stated | Yes |
| llms.txt | Not stated | Yes |
| Link verified | Jul 15, 2026 | Jul 15, 2026 |
| Listed since | Jul 12, 2026 | Jul 12, 2026 |
What each one is
Lightweight, privacy-first web analytics for docs and blogs; no cookie banner needed for developer audiences.
Plausible is listed under Analytics & listening, tagged open-source.
Questions
- What is the difference between Plausible and PostHog?
- Plausible is listed under Analytics & listening, tagged open-source. PostHog is listed under Analytics & listening, tagged open-source. On the criteria this directory records they differ on stars, mcp endpoint, llms.txt; everything else it tracks is the same for both.
- Which of Plausible and PostHog works with AI agents?
- PostHog publishes a machine-readable surface: an MCP endpoint or an llms.txt file, verified by our weekly health checks. Plausible does not publish one that we have verified.
How to read this
Every fact on this page is copied from the product's own site or repository and dated. We do not test these tools hands-on, we do not verify pricing, and the criteria are structural (what a product publishes) rather than qualitative (how well it works). Where a product does not state something, the table says so instead of guessing.
Keep comparing